
Rawley Soberano, Ph.D.
By Rawlein G. Soberano, Ph.D.
Germantown, MD (May 1, 2012) — In WI, a Dane County judge issued an injunction barring the state from using its new voter ID law. A hearing began April 25 with both sides presenting their opposing arguments to the Supreme Court. In the meantime, because the state did not successfully appeal the injunction, the new voter ID law was not in effect for the April 3 presidential primary.
If Gov. Jan Brewer wins this, Mitt Romney and many GOP candidates lose in the general elections in November. His entitlement claim to the presidency (by wife Ann), that it’s now his turn, will crumble to dust. SC has filed an appeal over DOJ’s denial of pre-clearance for its new voter ID law. DOJ found the law discriminatory because the state’s minority voters are 20 percent more likely than white voters to lack a photo ID that meets the standard. Thirty-one states require all voters to show ID before voting at the polls. In 15 of these, a voter with ID must include a photo of the voter; in the remaining 16, non-photo forms of ID are acceptable.







Recent Comments